Plugin Pulse Beta
← Pulse

Smart Internal Links

by Daniyal Hassan · SEO

Also makes 1 other plugin · 100+ installs across the portfolio →

Smart Internal Links automatically suggests and inserts relevant internal links in your posts to boost SEO and improve site navigation.

Try it live opens a temporary test site in your browser, which can take about 20 seconds to load. Plugins that rely on outside services or a full server may not work completely there.

⚠ Few reviews

Health

Not scored

no reviews to score from

Active installs

100+

≈150 estimated

Momentum

+66%

low volume, under 1,000 downloads a month

Biggest opportunity: “automatic linking”, “internal links” and “link building” aren't earning a slot. You list them, but you're not in the first 24 results for those searches. WordPress.org counts only your first five tags, so free the slot for a search you can win.

How scoring works →
— Not scored
Maintenance 90/100
Rating quality no data
Support no data

Not scored yet. Nobody has reviewed this plugin, so a grade would come from directory averages rather than from anything measured here.

Install conversion

How it's measured →

13%

of downloads still active

At least 100 of 765 lifetime downloads are still running, above its category: the median SEO plugin keeps 1.2%, across 1,196 plugins.

Downloads count every update, not just first installs, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. Compare against other SEO plugins, not across the directory. wp.org reports active installs as the bottom of a band, so the real rate is this or higher.

This plugin shipped 2 releases in the last 12 months, and every existing install that updated counted as another download. wp.org publishes no split between first installs and updates, so we show the raw rate rather than guess at one.

Details

Version
2.0.1
Last updated
5mo ago
Added
2026-05-23
Requires WP
5.0
Tested up to
7.0.8
Requires PHP
7.4

Directory ranking optimization

How it's scored →

How well this listing is tuned to rank in WordPress.org search, on the factors an owner controls. Not popularity, optimization.

88 / 100

Excellent listing optimization

Most to gain: Rating quality

Update recency 100/100

Updated 162 days ago

WP compatibility 100/100

Tested up to WordPress 7.0.8; the current branch is 7.1

Rating quality 49/100

No reviews yet, so wp.org scores it as a middling unrated listing

Listing tuning 100/100

5 of 5 tags set · short description in place

To rank higher: No reviews yet. wp.org scores an unrated plugin as middling on rating, so the first good reviews lift it.

Get the full rank-higher report →

Daily downloads

Since 26 May 2026 · 161 days · wp.org + Plugin Pulse archive

+66% low volume vs prior 30d
112 Nov 2026

30-day downloads

Rolling 30-day volume · peak 253 · peaks are release surges

1502 Nov 2026

Directory rank

Ranked about #13,300 to #16,400, alongside the other plugins at 100+ installs. Plugins with the same install count swap places between wp.org requests, so this is where most of them sit. Checked monthly, last on 1 Nov 2026.

Update activity

How busy the existing users are, measured as downloads in the last 30 days for every 1,000 active sites. A spike means a new release everyone's pulling; a long, slow decline means an aging user base that updates less.

1.5K2 Nov 2026

Release cadence

Occasionally updated
from wp.org release tags

How often this plugin actually ships. A steady rhythm is the maintenance signal a single "last updated" date can't show.

2

releases in the last 12 months

5mo ago

latest release · v2.0.1 · 25 May 2026

2

tagged releases on record

Recent releases

2.0.1 · 25 May 20262.0.0 · 25 May 2026

What its installed base runs

via wordpress.org

Share of active installs on each version of this plugin · 80% run the current release. Green is the current release; a big slice on older versions is a user base that has stopped updating.

v2.0 80%
v1.0 20%

Estimated active installs

The public count shows “100+”. Our estimate pins where the real number sits.

modeled estimate
100–200 ≈150

Modeled within the band wp.org reports; tightens as we track daily.

Install history since 25 May 2026

1002 Nov 2026

AI assistants

How it's measured →

Whether ChatGPT and Claude name this plugin when asked the category question, and whether the readme gives them something to quote.

This plugin’s searches fall outside the topics measured so far. See the topics measured so far.

Readme readiness

5 of 8 pass · checked 29 Oct 2026

Can an assistant quote this readme? Eight deterministic checks over the wp.org listing, no model involved.

  • ✓ Says what it does "Smart Internal Links automatically suggests and inserts relevant internal links in your posts to boost SEO..."
  • ✓ Has a FAQ 6 questions in the FAQ.
  • ✓ FAQ asks real questions 6 of 6 read like questions a user would type.
  • ! Names who it is for Never says who the plugin is for or what they use it for.
  • ✓ Names what it works with Mentions Gutenberg.
  • ! Headings and lists 0 headings and 2 lists; assistants quote headed sections and bullet lists, not paragraphs.
  • ✓ Enough to quote 1,547 characters of description.
  • ! Tags match the text Only 2 of 5 tags appear in the text ("automatic linking", "link building", "seo optimization" missing).

Growth timeline

Install-tier crossings we have observed, and how long each tier took to outgrow

No tier crossings observed yet.

Competes with

The plugins that solve the same job, ranked by shared tags then reach, closest match first. The letter on the right is each plugin's health grade (A best, F worst).

Embed this report card

Drop a live Pulse card for Smart Internal Links into a readme, a review or a deck. It updates itself.

<iframe src="https://plugins.wpmayor.com/embed/smart-internal-links" width="480" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Smart Internal Links — Plugin Pulse"></iframe>
Preview card ↗

Smart Internal Links: 100+ active installs, no reviews yet. Plugin Pulse (WP Mayor), as of 2026-11-03. https://plugins.wpmayor.com/plugin/smart-internal-links

Spotted a number that looks wrong? Report a data issue and we'll check it against the source.