Ad Auto Insert H vs True Lazy Analytics

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Health B79

Health C67

Active-install trajectory

Ad Auto Insert H moved down one install band, 1K+ to 900+; True Lazy Analytics moved down one install band, 6K+ to 5K+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	Ad Auto Insert H	True Lazy Analytics
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	900–1K	5K–6K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	-10% ✓	-17%
Overall health	B · 79 ✓	C · 67
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	90/100 ✓	51/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	74/100	83/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.0★	4.3★ ✓
Reviews	1	11 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	88/100 ✓	74/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	6mo ago ✓	1.3y ago
Downloads · 30d	339	748 ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	7.5%	8.4% ✓
Category	Analytics	Analytics

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Ad Auto Insert HTrue Lazy Analytics

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.