IMJOLWP Image Optimizer vs QuickWebP

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

IMJOLWP Image Optimizer

by Jahidul

Health C57

QuickWebP

by Ludwig You

Health A88

Active-install trajectory

IMJOLWP Image OptimizerQuickWebP

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	IMJOLWP Image Optimizer	QuickWebP
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	70–80	8K–9K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	+17% ✓	0%
Overall health	—	A · 88 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	43/100	100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	—	87/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	—	70/100 ✓
Rating (weighted for review count)	—	4.4★ ✓
Reviews	0	20 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	68/100	96/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	1.4y ago	yesterday ✓
Downloads · 30d	88	3.6K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	5.5%	12% ✓
Category	Performance	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

IMJOLWP Image OptimizerQuickWebP

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.