Init Content Protector vs Kripanov Anticopia

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Init Content Protector

by Init HTML

Health B83

Kripanov Anticopia

by kripanov

Health B80

Active-install trajectory

Init Content ProtectorKripanov Anticopia

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	Init Content Protector	Kripanov Anticopia
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	40–50	40–50
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	+300%	+300%
Overall health	B · 83 ✓	—
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	100/100	100/100
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	74/100 ✓	—
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100 ✓	—
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.0★ ✓	—
Reviews	1 ✓	0
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	88/100 ✓	75/100
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	1mo ago	25d ago ✓
Downloads · 30d	159	195 ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	3.0%	4.9% ✓
Category	Uncategorized	Uncategorized

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Init Content ProtectorKripanov Anticopia

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.