Plugin Pulse Beta
← Pulse

Init Content Protector – Anti-Copy, Anti-Scrape, Encrypt-All

by Init HTML · Uncategorized

Also makes 12 other plugins · 760+ installs across the portfolio →

Protect your content from copying, scraping, and inspection using JS blocking, keyword cloaking, noise injection, and optional full encryption.

Try it live opens a temporary test site in your browser, which can take about 20 seconds to load. Plugins that rely on outside services or a full server may not work completely there.

⚠ Few reviews

Health

B 83/100

Few reviews

Active installs

40+

≈40 estimated

Momentum

+68%

downloads vs prior 30d

Biggest opportunity: Swap “content protection”, “copy protection” and “encryption” for “devtools”, “encrypt” and “inspection”. “content protection” isn't earning its slot: you're not in the first 24 results for its own search. “devtools” sits at #4 untagged, close enough for a declared tag to move it up. “copy protection” isn't earning its slot: you're not in the first 24 results for its own search. “encrypt” sits at #15 untagged, close enough for a declared tag to move it up. “encryption” isn't earning its slot: you're not in the first 24 results for its own search. “inspection” sits at #15 untagged, close enough for a declared tag to move it up. All five slots are taken, so one has to go.

How scoring works →
83 Health · B
Maintenance 100/100
Rating quality 74/100
Support 70/100

83 health vs 58 average across 25,735 Uncategorized plugins

Install conversion

How it's measured →

3.0%

of downloads still active

At least 40 of 1.3K lifetime downloads are still running, above its category: the median Uncategorized plugin keeps 0.6%, across 17,766 plugins.

Downloads count every update, not just first installs, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. Compare against other Uncategorized plugins, not across the directory. wp.org reports active installs as the bottom of a band, so the real rate is this or higher.

Details

Version
1.7
Last updated
1mo ago
Added
2025-08-08 · 1 yr old
Requires WP
5.7
Tested up to
7.1.4
Requires PHP
7.4

Directory ranking optimization

How it's scored →

How well this listing is tuned to rank in WordPress.org search, on the factors an owner controls. Not popularity, optimization.

88 / 100

Excellent listing optimization

Most to gain: Rating quality

Update recency 100/100

Updated 35 days ago

WP compatibility 100/100

Tested up to WordPress 7.1.4, the current branch or newer

Rating quality 51/100

5.0★ over 1 review, smoothed to 4.12★ and held back under 25 reviews

Listing tuning 100/100

5 of 5 tags set · short description in place

To rank higher: Too few reviews to rank on quality — nudge happy users to leave one.

Get the full rank-higher report →

Daily downloads

Since 8 Aug 2025 · 449 days · wp.org + Plugin Pulse archive

+68% vs prior 30d
430 Oct 2026

30-day downloads

Rolling 30-day volume · peak 205 · peaks are release surges

14731 Oct 2026

Directory rank

Ranked about #21,400 to #22,800, alongside the other plugins at 40+ installs. Plugins with the same install count swap places between wp.org requests, so this is where most of them sit. Checked monthly, last on 21 Oct 2026.

Update activity

Downloads in the last 30 days for every 1,000 active sites.

Not enough installs to measure. This needs at least 100 active sites; below that, a handful of downloads reads as tens of thousands.

Estimated active installs

The public count shows “40+”. Our estimate pins where the real number sits.

tracked estimate
40–50 ≈40

Crossed into this band yesterday and a band this size takes about a year or more to cross, so the real count is still just over 40.

Install history since 15 Sep 2026

4031 Oct 2026

Languages

via translate.wordpress.org

Translated into 1 language, 1 at 90% or more

Vietnamese 100%

AI assistants

How it's measured →

Whether ChatGPT and Claude name this plugin when asked the category question, and whether the readme gives them something to quote.

Not measured yet for this plugin’s topics. Its tracked searches are not among the measured topics. See the topics measured so far.

Readme readiness

6 of 8 pass · checked 28 Oct 2026

Can an assistant quote this readme? Eight deterministic checks over the wp.org listing, no model involved.

  • ✓ Says what it does "Protect your content from copying, scraping, and inspection using JS blocking, keyword cloaking, noise inje..."
  • ✓ Has a FAQ 12 questions in the FAQ.
  • ✓ FAQ asks real questions 12 of 12 read like questions a user would type.
  • ! Names who it is for One audience phrase ("use this"); say who the plugin is for and what they use it for.
  • ✓ Names what it works with Mentions REST API.
  • ! Headings and lists 2 headings and 0 lists; assistants quote headed sections and bullet lists, not paragraphs.
  • ✓ Enough to quote 3,729 characters of description.
  • ✓ Tags match the text 3 of 5 tags appear in the text; "anti copy", "content-protection" do not.

Growth timeline

Install-tier crossings we have observed, and how long each tier took to outgrow

  1. 2026-10-30 30+ → 40+ up after 10 days in tier
  2. 2026-10-20 20+ → 30+ up after 11 days in tier
  3. 2026-10-09 10+ → 20+ up after 10 days in tier
  4. 2026-09-29 20+ → 10+ down after 13 days in tier
  5. 2026-09-16 10+ → 20+ up

Competes with

The plugins that solve the same job, ranked by shared tags then reach, closest match first. The letter on the right is each plugin's health grade (A best, F worst).

Embed this report card

Drop a live Pulse card for Init Content Protector – Anti-Copy, Anti-Scrape, Encrypt-All into a readme, a review or a deck. It updates itself.

<iframe src="https://plugins.wpmayor.com/embed/init-content-protector" width="480" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Init Content Protector – Anti-Copy, Anti-Scrape, Encrypt-All — Plugin Pulse"></iframe>
Preview card ↗

Init Content Protector – Anti-Copy, Anti-Scrape, Encrypt-All: 40+ active installs, 5.0★ (1 reviews). Plugin Pulse (WP Mayor), as of 2026-10-31. https://plugins.wpmayor.com/plugin/init-content-protector

Spotted a number that looks wrong? Report a data issue and we'll check it against the source.