instant.page vs LiteSpeed Cache

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Health D51

Health A88

Active-install trajectory

instant.page moved down one install band, 3K+ to 2K+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric	instant.page	LiteSpeed Cache
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	2K–3K	7M–8M ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window.	-33%	0% ✓
Overall health	D · 51	A · 88 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	7/100	100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	89/100	96/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100 ✓	59/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.5★	4.8★ ✓
Reviews	17	2,778 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	51/100	91/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Elevated	Low ✓
Last updated	3.2y ago	yesterday ✓
Downloads · 30d	404	2.2M ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	3.3%	5.0% ✓
Category	Performance	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

instant.pageLiteSpeed Cache

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.