← Compare

LuckyWP ACF Menu Field vs User Menus

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

User Menus is the safest pick: health A · 92 against 67 for LuckyWP ACF Menu Field, led by stronger maintenance.

Active-install trajectory

No change to chart. WordPress.org reports active installs in coarse bands, so neither plugin crossed a band during this window. The download trend below moves daily and is the better read over a period this short.

Metric	LuckyWP ACF Menu Field	User Menus
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	5K–6K	80K–90K ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	Stable	Stable
Overall health	C · 67	A · 92 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	44/100	100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	91/100	99/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100	70/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	4.6★	4.9★ ✓
Reviews	20	1,282 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	76/100	100/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	Low	Low
Last updated	1.4y ago	2mo ago ✓
Downloads, last 30d	1.1K	3.2K ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	+8%	+2%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	8.3%	8.8% ✓
Category	Developer Tools	Admin & Utilities

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

LuckyWP ACF Menu FieldUser Menus

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.