← Compare

QQWorld Speed for China vs Speed Optimizer

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Speed Optimizer is the safest pick: health A · 85 against 44 for QQWorld Speed for China, led by lower removal risk.

Active-install trajectory

QQWorld Speed for ChinaSpeed Optimizer

Active installs, each indexed to 100 at the start of the window. A line above 100 is growing its install base, below 100 is shrinking.

Metric	QQWorld Speed for China	Speed Optimizer
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads.	80–90	1M–2M ✓
Active installs, change over ~6 months Compares the public install bands. One band step shows as the band change, not a percentage.	-20%	Stable ✓
Overall health	D · 44	A · 85 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated.	3/100	100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality.	73/100	79/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved.	70/100 ✓	68/100
Rating (weighted for review count)	3.9★	4.1★ ✓
Reviews	4	641 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org.	33/100	90/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status.	High	Low ✓
Last updated	5.8y ago	3d ago ✓
Downloads, last 30d	93	4.2M ✓
Download momentum, last 30d vs prior 30d Dips that follow a release spike are normal: wp.org counts every update as a download, so the weeks after a release run lower.	+8%	+5%
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower.	0.4%	0.9% ✓
Category	Performance	Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

QQWorld Speed for ChinaSpeed Optimizer

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.