Plugin Pulse Beta
← Compare

Unveil Lazy Load vs Autoptimize

Head-to-head on the signals that matter, from the public WordPress.org data.

Active-install trajectory

Unveil Lazy Load moved down one install band, 3K+ to 2K+; Autoptimize moved down one install band, 900K+ to 800K+. That's a single step across the whole window, so there's no trajectory to draw. The download trend below moves daily.

Metric Unveil Lazy Load Autoptimize
Active installs Modeled from the public "N+" band and recent downloads. 2K–3K 800K–900K ✓
Install trend Change in active installs across the charted window. -33% -11% ✓
Overall health D · 48 A · 94 ✓
Maintenance How recently the plugin was updated. 3/100 100/100 ✓
Rating quality Volume-adjusted review quality. 85/100 94/100 ✓
Support Share of forum threads marked resolved. 70/100 86/100 ✓
Rating (weighted for review count) 4.4★ 4.7★ ✓
Reviews 15 1,428 ✓
Ranking optimization How well the listing is tuned to rank on wp.org. 37/100 96/100 ✓
Removal risk Maintenance signals that precede a wp.org closure. Not an official status. High Low ✓
Last updated 8.9y ago 10d ago ✓
Downloads · 30d 290 585.6K ✓
Install conversion Active installs over lifetime downloads. Downloads include every update, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. 3.5% ✓ 1.8%
Category Performance Performance

✓ marks the stronger plugin on each row. Rows where they're level show no marker.

Release activity

Unveil Lazy LoadAutoptimize

7-day average daily downloads. Downloads spike for about a week after each release as the install base re-downloads, so read this as release cadence, not growth.