Plugin Pulse Beta
← Pulse

JavaScript to Footer

by Vladimir Prelovac · Performance

Also makes 20 other plugins · 18.6K+ installs across the portfolio →

This plugin automatically moves JavaScript code to page footer, speeding up page loading time.

Try it live opens a temporary test site in your browser, which can take about 20 seconds to load. Plugins that rely on outside services or a full server may not work completely there.

⚠ Stale⚠ Likely abandoned

Health

F 39/100

Stale · Likely abandoned

Active installs

500+

≈570 estimated

Momentum

+16%

downloads vs prior 30d

Biggest opportunity: “footer”, “javascript” and “optimization” aren't earning a slot. You list them, but you're not in the first 24 results for those searches. WordPress.org counts only your first five tags, so free the slot for a search you can win.

How scoring works →
39 Health · F
Maintenance 3/100
Rating quality 59/100
Support 70/100

39 health vs 69 average across 1,808 Performance plugins

Install conversion

How it's measured →

0.6%

of downloads still active

At least 500 of 81.9K lifetime downloads are still running, below its category: the median Performance plugin keeps 1.4%, across 1,103 plugins.

Downloads count every update, not just first installs, so older and more frequently released plugins read lower. Compare against other Performance plugins, not across the directory. wp.org reports active installs as the bottom of a band, so the real rate is this or higher.

High removal-risk signals

63/100

Maintenance and integrity signals that tend to precede a WordPress.org removal. Not an official status, a heads-up to act.

  • Long abandoned. No update in 11+ years — the top precursor to removal once a vulnerability is found.
  • Compatibility drift. Tested only up to WordPress 4.2.39, well behind 6.8.

Details

Version
0.4.1
Last updated
11.9y ago
Added
2008-12-02 · 17 yrs old
Requires WP
2.3
Tested up to
4.2.39
Requires PHP
—

Directory ranking optimization

How it's scored →

How well this listing is tuned to rank in WordPress.org search, on the factors an owner controls. Not popularity, optimization.

36 / 100

Under-optimized

Most to gain: Update recency

Update recency 0/100

Updated 4331 days ago, past the ~180 days where wp.org starts discounting

WP compatibility 4/100

Tested up to WordPress 4.2.39; the current branch is 6.8

Rating quality 65/100

2.9★ over 16 reviews, smoothed to 3.81★ and held back under 25 reviews

Listing tuning 84/100

3 of 5 tags set · short description in place

To rank higher: Last updated 4331 days ago — ship an update; wp.org decays a listing's search weight after ~180 days.

Get the full rank-higher report →

Daily downloads

Since 5 Oct 2022 · 1,488 days · wp.org + Plugin Pulse archive

+16% vs prior 30d
1131 Oct 2026

30-day downloads

Rolling 30-day volume · peak 271 · peaks are release surges

26931 Oct 2026

Directory rank vs rivals

wp.org popularity rank over time · higher is better · when a rival's line climbs above yours, they've overtaken you

JavaScript to Footer · #8908youSOGO Add Script to I · #1145Scripts To Footer · #2580WP Deferred JavaScri · #7505

Rating trend

Star average over time · dips mark rough releases

2.931 Oct 2026

Health trend

Composite health score, snapshotted daily

3931 Oct 2026

Update activity

How busy the existing users are, measured as downloads in the last 30 days for every 1,000 active sites. A spike means a new release everyone's pulling; a long, slow decline means an aging user base that updates less.

53831 Oct 2026

What its installed base runs

via wordpress.org

Share of active installs on each version of this plugin · 100% run the current release. Green is the current release; a big slice on older versions is a user base that has stopped updating.

v0.4 100%

Estimated active installs

The public count shows “500+”. Our estimate pins where the real number sits.

tracked estimate
500–600 ≈570

Crossed into this band 4 months ago; a band this size takes about a year or more to cross, which places it about 65% of the way through.

Install history since 21 Mar 2015

50031 Oct 2026

Recent reviews

All reviews on wp.org ↗
  1. ★★★★★ AB Siddik
    10.1y ago

    I used and face some of bad experience with it

    Read on wp.org ↗
  2. ★★★★★ Zudwa
    10.8y ago

    Good

    Read on wp.org ↗
  3. ★★★★★ convictedvapour
    10.8y ago

    This plugin fails to do it’s job and breaks many sites I tetsed with DO NOT USE IT!

    Read on wp.org ↗
  4. ★★★★★ Qamrul Haque
    11.2y ago

    It breaks sidebar widgets, adsense, search box, subscription box, etc.

    Read on wp.org ↗
  5. ★★★★★ Rob Robot
    11.5y ago

    Thank you Vladimir Prelovac for this great plugin. It’s work for me.

    Read on wp.org ↗
  6. ★★★★★ macdonjo
    11.7y ago

    It moved a lot of the files as it should. Great plugin for those who know what they are doing!

    Read on wp.org ↗
  7. ★★★★★ Lion70
    11.7y ago

    I tried this plugin to help speed up my site and fix the ‘render blocking scripts’ issues. According to pagespeed it did neither. I usually try the support area first before leaving a bad review but, when I went there I did not see the plugin author reply to any of the support threads; nor do I see the plugin author replying to any of the review posts here. Which tells me the plugin author isn’t going to give me or anyone else any help.

    Read on wp.org ↗
  8. ★★★★★ sureno
    11.8y ago

    Thanks a lot, your plugin it’s good for me.

    Read on wp.org ↗

Behavioral tests

via WP Hive

Automated install-time checks, tested on PHP 7.2.16 · WP 5.3

✓ Low memory footprint
✓ Low page-speed impact
✓ Runs on latest PHP + WP
✓ No PHP errors
✓ No JS errors
✓ Activates cleanly
✓ No resource errors
✓ No external HTTP errors
✓ Optimized database use
✕ Frequently updated

AI assistants

How it's measured →

Whether ChatGPT and Claude name this plugin when asked the category question, and whether the readme gives them something to quote.

Not measured yet for this plugin’s topics. Its tracked searches are not among the measured topics. See the topics measured so far.

Readme readiness

2 of 8 pass · checked 25 Oct 2026

Can an assistant quote this readme? Eight deterministic checks over the wp.org listing, no model involved.

  • ! Says what it does Short description names no action; say what the plugin does for the site.
  • ! Has a FAQ Only 2 questions in the FAQ; 3 or more gives an assistant something to match.
  • ! FAQ asks real questions 0 of 2 FAQ entries are headings, not questions ("undefined").
  • ! Names who it is for Never says who the plugin is for or what they use it for.
  • ! Names what it works with Names no plugin, service or platform it works with.
  • ! Headings and lists 1 heading and 0 lists; assistants quote headed sections and bullet lists, not paragraphs.
  • ✓ Enough to quote 1,771 characters of description.
  • ✓ Tags match the text 2 of 3 tags appear in the text; "optimization" does not.

Growth timeline

Install-tier crossings we have observed, and how long each tier took to outgrow

  1. 2026-06-26 600+ → 500+ down after 191 days in tier
  2. 2025-12-17 700+ → 600+ down after 241 days in tier
  3. 2025-04-20 800+ → 700+ down after 202 days in tier
  4. 2024-09-30 900+ → 800+ down after 158 days in tier
  5. 2024-04-25 1K+ → 900+ down after 1 days in tier
  6. 2024-04-24 900+ → 1K+ up after 1 days in tier
  7. 2024-04-23 1K+ → 900+ down after 947 days in tier
  8. 2021-09-19 2K+ → 1K+ down after 333 days in tier

Competes with

The plugins that solve the same job, ranked by shared tags then reach, closest match first. The letter on the right is each plugin's health grade (A best, F worst).

Embed this report card

Drop a live Pulse card for JavaScript to Footer into a readme, a review or a deck. It updates itself.

<iframe src="https://plugins.wpmayor.com/embed/footer-javascript" width="480" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="JavaScript to Footer — Plugin Pulse"></iframe>
Preview card ↗

JavaScript to Footer: 500+ active installs, 2.9★ (16 reviews). Plugin Pulse (WP Mayor), as of 2026-10-31. https://plugins.wpmayor.com/plugin/footer-javascript

Spotted a number that looks wrong? Report a data issue and we'll check it against the source.