Honest rankings: “instagram”
WordPress.org search rewards raw install count with no ceiling, so the biggest install bases float to the top regardless of quality signals. Here's what searchers actually see, next to a merit ranking that caps the install factor and weights ratings by review volume. How this works →
Install-weight distortion
WPZOOM Social Feed Widget & Block sits at wp.org #3 but earns only #17 on merit , 96% of its ranking comes from install count alone, on 60K+ installs at just 4.3★.
Buried gem
Essential Addons for Elementor – Popular Elementor Templates & Widgets deserves #1 on merit but wp.org shows it at #18 , 4.9★ from 4088 reviews, buried by lower-quality plugins with bigger install counts.
Merit ranking caps the install boost at 1M (wp.org leaves it uncapped), replaces the raw star average with a volume-weighted Bayesian score and a Wilson lower bound, and keeps wp.org's own freshness and compatibility decays. Method from the plugin-directory source; see Meta Trac #8298. Positions are tracked daily from the first visit to a keyword, so the small arrows show movement since tracking began.